Which phrase best describes a "motion to table"?

A "motion to table" is best described as a request to postpone further action on a specific motion or discussion. This type of motion is often used to set aside a matter temporarily, allowing the assembly to attend to more urgent business or discussions before returning to the tabled item later. The intent is not to reject or conclude the matter permanently but to allow for a delay for strategic reasons, such as gathering more information or allowing other priorities to take precedence.

This distinguishes it from stopping a discussion outright, which suggests a definitive end rather than a postponement. Additionally, while it may seem similar to suggestions for immediate voting, a motion to table does not decide on the motion at hand but rather places it on hold. Similarly, amending a motion involves altering the original motion's terms, which is a different parliamentary action altogether. Thus, the correct characterization of a "motion to table" as a request to postpone further action aligns with its function in parliamentary procedure.