When participating in a small board meeting, how is motion handling different from larger boards?

In small board meetings, the process of handling motions is often more informal compared to larger boards. One key difference is that seconding a motion is typically not required in small boards. This is because, in a smaller setting, members are usually more familiar with one another and the issues at hand, allowing for a more streamlined and efficient decision-making process.

In larger boards, the formality of seconding a motion helps to ensure that there is sufficient interest in the motion before it is discussed, thereby maintaining order and structure during the meeting. The absence of a requirement for formal seconding in small boards supports quicker discussions and encourages participation from all members, as it allows for a more relaxed and collaborative environment where ideas can flow freely.

Moreover, the other aspects mentioned in the other choices (requests needing to go through the chairman or all motions needing to be in writing) tend to be typical in both small and larger boards, aimed at maintaining order and clarity in the meeting’s proceedings, but they do not highlight the distinctive flexibility present in the small board's approach to motion handling.