What should a member do if they disagree with a decision but cannot debate it?

When a member disagrees with a decision but cannot engage in debate, the appropriate course of action is to request a "division of the house." This procedure allows for a count of votes to verify the outcome of a decision that has been made, ensuring that all members have a chance to express their stance on the issue at hand, even if a formal debate on the matter cannot take place.

Requesting a division is essential because it upholds the democratic principle of making sure that every member's opinion is considered through a vote. This process can reveal whether there is enough support to challenge the initial decision or ensure that it aligns with the majority's will.

The other options, while they may seem like alternatives, are not suitable in this context. For instance, introducing a motion to suspend would be irrelevant if the member's primary concern is to challenge a decision already made rather than changing the rule temporarily. Making a formal appeal typically involves invoking rules that allow debate on the decision, which wouldn't apply if a member cannot debate. Lastly, using a point of order is meant for raising concerns about procedural issues during a meeting and does not directly address disagreement with a decision made. Therefore, requesting a division of the house is the most fitting action to take in this situation