What is true regarding the need for a seconder on small boards or committees?

In small boards or committees, the need for a seconder is often relaxed due to the more informal nature and the close working relationship among members. In such settings, it is commonly accepted that proposed motions may not require a formal second. This flexibility allows for more efficient discussions and decision-making, as members often understand the intent and support of each other's motions without requiring the procedural step of seconding.

On larger boards, the requirement for a second is more strictly enforced to ensure that proposed motions are supported by more than one member, indicating a broader interest in discussion. However, in smaller groups, where communication is more direct and members are familiar with each other’s viewpoints, the need for a second can be deemed unnecessary.

This context illustrates why the idea that proposed motions need not be seconded is accurate for small committees, promoting a smoother and more efficient flow of business.