What is the main difference between "debatable" and "non-debatable" motions?

The main difference between debatable and non-debatable motions is that debatable motions allow for discussion among the members before a vote takes place, while non-debatable motions do not permit discussion. This distinction is important in parliamentary procedure as it affects how members can express their opinions, ask questions, and engage with the motion at hand. When a motion is debatable, it opens the floor for members to share their perspectives, argue for or against the motion, and potentially amend it. In contrast, with non-debatable motions, the focus is typically on swift decision-making or procedural matters, meaning that members cannot engage in discussion and must vote immediately.

The other options do not accurately capture this fundamental difference. For instance, while some motions may require a simple majority to pass, this characteristic is not exclusive to debatable motions. Additionally, it is not the case that non-debatable motions can only be made by the chair; such motions can also be introduced by any member, depending on the rules of the organization. Lastly, claiming there is no difference between the two types of motions undermines the essential function that debate serves in legislative proceedings.