If a special rule of order conflicts with an organization's parliamentary authority, which should be used?

When a special rule of order exists, it takes precedence over the general parliamentary authority. This principle is founded on the notion that special rules are tailored to specific situations or needs of the organization and are therefore designed to govern those circumstances specifically. Consequently, if there is a conflict between a special rule of order and the overarching parliamentary authority, the special rule is utilized because it reflects the organization's distinct procedural requirements that have been formally adopted.

Special rules are often created to address particular issues that arise within an organization, allowing for flexibility and customization of procedures beyond what is established in standard parliamentary authority. This adaptability helps organizations operate more efficiently in accordance with their unique needs. Hence, when a conflict arises, the special rule's specificity and applicability provide the necessary guidance for managing the situation at hand.

In contrast, the parliamentary authority provides a broader framework, and while it is vital for general governance, it does not supersede the specific directives laid out in special rules that have been duly implemented by the organization.